634
5.0
更新HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
5.0
上映时间:04月29日
主演:未知
简介:Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.  These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.  Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...  Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...?  Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.  Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.  Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.  Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.  Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.  Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life? can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.  Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.  Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.  Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.  Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.  Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.  Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept  Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.  Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.  Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.  Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.  Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.  Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.
634
更新HD中字
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
600
1.0
更新HD
爱情只能持续三年
1.0
上映时间:04月07日
主演:加斯帕德·普鲁斯特,露易丝·布尔昆,乔伊·斯塔尔,乔纳森·朗贝尔,弗雷德里克·贝尔,尼古拉斯·贝多斯,伊丽莎·瑟娜薇,贝尔纳·梅内斯,安妮·杜普蕾,托马斯·儒阿特,克里斯托弗·伯勒,瓦莱丽·勒梅西埃,庞·克莱门捷夫,Camille Verschuere,Chloé Beigbeder
简介:

风流倜傥的男主人公马克·玛隆尼埃(加斯帕德·普鲁斯特 Gaspard Proust饰),白天是仪表堂堂的文学评论家,晚上则是热衷出入社交界的专栏作家。他刚刚离婚,结束与妻子的三年爱情生活。他一直都很肯定爱情只能维持三年的说法,甚至专门写了一篇文章来论证这一观点。此时的他对婚姻持强烈的反对态度,并且扬言再也不相信爱情了。马克在祖母的葬礼上遇见了表嫂爱丽丝(露易丝·布尔昆 Louise Bourgoin饰),美丽动人的爱丽丝让马克颠覆了他之前的观念,两人迅速坠入爱河。甜蜜的两人一起欣赏音乐,一起在巴黎街头漫步,一切似乎在完美地发展着。可马克并不知道的是——爱丽丝正是一本叫《爱情只能持续三年》小说的作者。两人最终到底能不能收获“天长地久”的爱情呢?

600
更新HD
爱情只能持续三年
主演:加斯帕德·普鲁斯特,露易丝·布尔昆,乔伊·斯塔尔,乔纳森·朗贝尔,弗雷德里克·贝尔,尼古拉斯·贝多斯,伊丽莎·瑟娜薇,贝尔纳·梅内斯,安妮·杜普蕾,托马斯·儒阿特,克里斯托弗·伯勒,瓦莱丽·勒梅西埃,庞·克莱门捷夫,Camille Verschuere,Chloé Beigbeder
600
10.0
更新HD
局外人2016
10.0
上映时间:05月01日
主演:亚瑟·杜彭,弗朗索瓦-格扎维埃·德梅松,萨巴纳·奥扎尼,陶菲克·杰拉巴,托马斯·库芒,索伦·普雷沃斯特,弗兰兹-鲁道夫·郎,吕克·席尔茨,穆罕默德·阿列兹基,安布鲁瓦兹·米歇尔,本杰明·莱蒙,斯特凡纳·巴克,马斯·贝尔西托,罗宾·希纳西
简介:

《放牛班的春天》法国导演克里斯托夫·巴拉蒂执导,凯萨奖男星亚瑟·杜彭主演。   电影改编自真实事件,九年前震惊全球的「500亿欧元交易弊案」,描述2008年时,31岁的巴黎交易员杰宏柯维耶在未经授权下进行金融买卖,涉及的投资金额高达500亿欧元,几乎导致法国兴业银行(Société Générale)倒闭,更引发全球金融大暴泻。这位人称「魔鬼交易员」的柯维耶,如何偷天换日、秘密进行500亿欧元的交易?由于金额太过庞大,让人怀疑内情不单纯,不仅国际议论纷纷,更成为金融机构的职训教材。   拜该案知名度之赐,《巴黎交易员》各国版权狂卖,不仅电影获伊斯坦堡金桔奖提名最佳影片,导演巴拉蒂更获好莱坞报导讚誉「挖掘出事件的娱乐性」。   剧情讲述,杰宏来自布列塔尼,他幸运挤身法兴银行,在获主管同侪欣赏下,摇身成为巴黎交易员。人生鲤跃龙门,眼界自此大开,而他在股价期货交易赚到...

600
更新HD
局外人2016
主演:亚瑟·杜彭,弗朗索瓦-格扎维埃·德梅松,萨巴纳·奥扎尼,陶菲克·杰拉巴,托马斯·库芒,索伦·普雷沃斯特,弗兰兹-鲁道夫·郎,吕克·席尔茨,穆罕默德·阿列兹基,安布鲁瓦兹·米歇尔,本杰明·莱蒙,斯特凡纳·巴克,马斯·贝尔西托,罗宾·希纳西